Pantun-Based Cognitive Activation And Local Inquiry: Enhancing Mathematical Critical Thinking Through Bilah Panai Cultural Practices

Authors

  • Endi Zunaedy Pasaribu Universitas Al Washliyah Labuhanbatu
  • Mesra Wati Ritonga Universitas Al Washliyah Labuhanbatu
  • Zul Amry Universitas Negeri Medan
  • Edy Surya Universitas Negeri Medan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30596/tjpt.v6i1.642

Keywords:

Mathematical Critical Thinking, Ethnomathematics, Bilah Panai Culture;, Pantun, Local Inquiry, Culturally Responsive Mathematics Education

Abstract

Mathematical critical thinking is a fundamental competency in mathematics education; however, instructional practices often provide limited opportunities for students to engage in reasoning, inquiry, and reflective thinking. While ethnomathematics has been increasingly integrated into mathematics learning, most studies emphasize cultural artifacts as contextual resources rather than cultural practices as mechanisms of thinking. This study explores the role of Bilah Panai cultural practices, namely pantun and merisik/telangkai, in enhancing students’ mathematical critical thinking skills. Pantun was implemented as a cognitive activation strategy to stimulate prior knowledge and interpretation, whereas merisik/telangkai was adapted as a local inquiry process that encouraged investigation, discussion, argumentation, and collaborative problem solving. The study involved Grade 10 students participating in mathematics learning activities grounded in Bilah Panai cultural practices. Data were collected through classroom observations, students’ mathematical critical thinking assessments, and learning activity documentation. The findings indicate that pantun supported students in identifying mathematical ideas and constructing initial interpretations, while merisik/telangkai facilitated reasoning, analysis, and problem-solving processes. These cultural practices created meaningful learning experiences and promoted active engagement in mathematical inquiry. The study highlights the potential of local cultural practices to function not merely as learning contexts but as cognitive and inquiry mechanisms that support the development of mathematical critical thinking. This finding contributes to the advancement of ethnomathematics and culturally responsive mathematics education. Quantitative findings showed an improvement in students’ mathematical critical thinking scores from a mean pretest score of 58.60 to a mean posttest score of 88.20, yielding a high normalized gain score (g = 0.715).

Keywords: Mathematical Critical Thinking; Ethnomathematics; Bilah Panai Culture; Pantun; Local Inquiry; Culturally Responsive Mathematics Education.

References

Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

D’Ambrosio, U. (1985). Ethnomathematics and its place in the history and pedagogy of mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 5(1), 44–48.

Dhema, M., Cholily, Y. M., & Rahardjanto, A. (2024). Tracing local wisdom in the integration of ethnomathematics in mathematics education: A systematic literature review. Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(3), 215–230.

Earthadara, I. G. A. A., Sudiarta, I. G. P., & Ardana, I. M. (2025). Cognitive activation and mathematics achievement: The mediating role of proactive learning behavior. Journal on Mathematics Education, 16(1), 45–61.

Ennis, R. H. (2011). The nature of critical thinking: An outline of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. University of Illinois.

Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. The Delphi Report.

Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.

Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3

Iffah, N., Suryadi, D., & Juandi, D. (2025). Global trends in ethnomathematics research: A bibliometric and systematic review. Journal on Mathematics Education, 16(2), 201–220.

Iskandar, J., Karjanto, N., Kusumah, Y. S., & Ihsan, H. (2022). Trends and developments in ethnomathematics research: A review of cultural approaches in mathematics education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(8), 1–15.

Kuhn, D. (2018). A role for reasoning in a dialogic approach to critical thinking. Topoi, 37(1), 121–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-016-9373-4

Ladson-Billings, G. (2021). Culturally relevant pedagogy: Asking a different question. Teachers College Press.

Loughland, T., Bobis, J., & Way, J. (2024). Cognitive activation and student engagement in mathematics classrooms. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 36(2), 287–305.

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results: The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2025). Unlocking high-quality teaching: Ensuring cognitive engagement in classrooms. OECD Publishing.

Permatasari, D. A., Nurhayati, N., & Kusuma, A. (2024). The impact of teaching strategies on students’ critical thinking in mathematics education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Research, 124, 102305.

Rosa, M., & Orey, D. C. (2021). An ethnomathematical perspective of STEM education in a glocalized world. Journal of Mathematics and Culture, 15(1), 1–22.

Sakdiyah, S. K. (2025). Implementation of problem-based learning with ethnomathematics to enhance students’ mathematical literacy: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis (2020–2025). Media Pendidikan Matematika, 13(2), 1104–1117.

Saleh, A., Phillips, T. M., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Glazewski, K. D., Mott, B. W., & Lester, J. C. (2022). A learning analytics approach toward understanding collaborative inquiry in a problem-based learning environment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(5), 1321–1342.

Sunzuma, G., & Umbara, U. (2025). Ethnomathematics-based technology in Indonesia: A systematic review. International Journal of Research in STEM Education, 4(1), 1–20.

Suryati, D., & Maryati, I. (2025). Students’ mathematical critical thinking skills: Trends, challenges, and future directions in mathematics education. Journal of Mathematics Learning Research, 8(1), 45–63.

Suryawan, I. P. P., Sudiarta, I. G. P., & Suharta, I. G. P. (2023). Students’ critical thinking skills in solving mathematical problems: A systematic literature review. Journal on Mathematics Education, 14(3), 523–540.

Syahbana, A. (2012). Peningkatan kemampuan berpikir kritis matematis siswa SMP melalui pendekatan contextual teaching and learning. Edumatica, 2(1), 45–57.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Zha, Y., Li, H., & Wang, X. (2025). Cognitive activation, emotional engagement, and learning outcomes in secondary education. Learning and Instruction, 91, 101932.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-18

How to Cite

Endi Zunaedy Pasaribu, Mesra Wati Ritonga, Zul Amry, & Edy Surya. (2026). Pantun-Based Cognitive Activation And Local Inquiry: Enhancing Mathematical Critical Thinking Through Bilah Panai Cultural Practices. Tsaqila | Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Teknologi, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.30596/tjpt.v6i1.642

Issue

Section

Articles